Type | Distribution | Hx | Notes | Management |
Hypertensive | Deep grey (putamen, thalamus), pons, cerebellum BG- 50% Thal - 15% BS/pons - 10-15% Cb - 10% |
Hypertension | Pathophys: - vessel wall hypertrophy/ischemia/necrosis => vessel wall replaced with collagen - scar can fill lumen (lipohyalinosis) => ischemia -charcot buchard aneurysmal weakening of scar wall => bleed |
- ABCD - Control ICP (suspect high ICP if coma, edema/effacement, blood in vents, HTN/bradycard) - INR < 1.5, plt > 100,000 - Control BP: goal CPP > 60, so MAP goal should be 60+ICP. If unknown ICP: MAP goal 90-100 (bc ICP>30-40 is unsurvivable anyways). If no ICP issues: goal SBP 120-160 |
Amyloid | Lobar (esp parietal, occip), NOT deep grey. GRE shows microhemorrhages in lobar distribution. | Old (>75), not hypertensive. If young, look for other pathology | Amyloid deposits in small vessels - unknown why deep vessels spared. | Don’t anticoagulate - very high risk of rebleed |
DAI | Grey-white junction, corpus callosum, dorsal brainstem | High speed trauma | Punctate bleeds | Supportive |
Contusion | Surface of convexity, anterior frontal, base of temporal lobes, coup-contrecoup (i.e occipital-frontal) | Trauma | - Pathophys: Brain scrapes against bumpy bone (temporal, frontal) - Trauma bleeds: mixed density, boggy tissue, edema. |
|
Venous thrombosis | Temporal (esp post temp), b/l BG/thalamus, parasagittal | UC/IBD, OCPs, peripartum, HRT, kids with viral GI | - UC/IBD: hypercoag, + dehydration 2/2 diarrhea - Kids: dehydration 2/2 viral sickness |
- Anticoagulate, even though there is blood in the head: Heparin gtt bridge to coumadin - Look for clot (MRV/CTV) |
Tumor | Anywhere | Hx of cancer | - Mets (chorio, thyroid, RCC, breast, lung, melanoma) - GBM |
depends on tumor type |
Aneurysm | 99% of the time, you will see SAH | aneurysmal SAH story | In isolated IPH, aneurysm is very unlikely, so no indication for immediate angio to look for one. | Aneurysms should be fixed immediately - AVMs and cavernomas should wait |
AVM/AVF/cavernoma | “weird” location - non arterial or venous distribution: i.e. along tent (dural AVF), superficial lobar | Age < 50, not hypertensive | Cavs cant be seen on angio; need MRI in 1-2 mos after blood clears | AVMs and Cavernomas should not be fixed immediately - should give brain time to metaphorically cool down. |
When to operate:
- Relatively stronger indications: Cerebellar, rapidly deteriorating clinical status
STICH I:
- Lancet 2005; data collected 1995-2003
- No difference in outcomes between early surgery and conservative treatment
- Inclusion: spontaneous ICH > 2cm within 72 hrs, GCS > 5
- Exclusion: secondary ICH (i.e. 2/2 aneurysm, AVM, tumor, trauma), bleed involving cerebellum or brainstem, severely disabled at baseline, couldn't undergo surgery within 24h of randomisation.
Commentary/thoughts (from me)
- the only group that seems to have any benefit are those with hematomas really close to the surface (<1cm), and even then, its just barely significant -- (OR 0.47-1.01)
- 25% of the group randomized to conservative treatment ended up getting surgery-- like all neurosurgery trials, a lot of crossover to contend with.
- people with GCS 5-8 who got surgery did much worse; in the context of 25% crossover, this finding may be confounded by a subset of people who are crashing and burning clinically and get emergent surgery as a heroic measure. In other words, this may be more indicative of poor slope of clinical function rather than a condemnation of surgery. Everyone who came in with GCS<8 in the trial ended up with an unfavorable outcome....
- the definition of a 'favorable' outcome was a function of prognosis - for older patients who came in with GCS<8, mRS 3 or less is considered favorable, which is fair but sad.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.